<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital DSLR Blog &#187; 5D Mark II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/tag/5d-mark-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog</link>
	<description>DSLR and Digital Photography Reviews Done Right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 22:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Adobe Premiere and Proxy Files</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/adobe-premiere-and-proxy-files/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/adobe-premiere-and-proxy-files/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDSLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5D Mark II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5D2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Premiere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CS4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy Files]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking videos with the Canon 5D Mark II is becoming more common, I&#8217;ve been having trouble working with the files in Adobe Premiere.  The original MOV files are running at 40MB/sec which can bring most computers to a halt.  I recently came across a great article which talked about using Proxy files in order to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking videos with the Canon 5D Mark II is becoming more common, I&#8217;ve been having trouble working with the files in Adobe Premiere.  The original MOV files are running at 40MB/sec which can bring most computers to a halt.  I recently came across a great article which talked about using Proxy files in order to do all your editing and never have to use the render function in order to see the preview movie playback smoothly.<span id="more-56"></span></p>
<p>Sébastien goes into a bit more explanation of why he choose different resolutions, but here is quick rundown of the process for creating the proxy files and using them in Adobe Premiere.</p>
<p><strong>Step 1 &#8211; Create Proxy Files</strong><br />
1.) Open AME<br />
2.) Import Clips to Render<br />
3.) Select Quicktime, H264, Square Pixel, Progressive frames, 960&#215;540 resolution, 6000kbps<br />
4.) Render Clips to Separate folder from Originals</p>
<p><strong>Step 2 &#8211; Edit Video in Premiere</strong><br />
1.) Create New Project<br />
2.) Import all Original Files to be Used<br />
3.) Highlight all Files.  Right Click Make Offline<br />
4.) Right Click again and click Link Media<br />
5.) Select Proxy files done in Step 1<br />
6.) Adjust Resolution Size &#8211; Clip -&gt; Video Options -&gt; Scale to Frame Size<br />
7.) Drag Proxy Files into Time Line and Start Editing and Adding Effects<br />
8.) Once Finished, Select all files again and Right Click and Make Offline<br />
9.) Again, Right Click and Link Files back to the Originals<br />
10.) Adjust Resolution Size and this time uncheck Scale to Frame Size (See #6)<br />
11.) File -&gt; Export Media<br />
12.) Select Output resolution</p>
<p>Now you can do all your editing on the proxy files and never have to render out the movie to see it play smoothly.  To view the full article by Sébastien, click on over to <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/2641870">http://www.vimeo.com/2641870</a>.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" onmouseover="a2a_show_dropdown(this)" onmouseout="a2a_onMouseOut_delay()" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Digital%20DSLR%20Blog&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=Adobe%20Premiere%20and%20Proxy%20Files&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2Fadobe-premiere-and-proxy-files%2F"><img src="http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/adobe-premiere-and-proxy-files/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 5D Mark II vs Canon 1D Mark II Noise Test</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-canon-1d-mark-ii-noise-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-canon-1d-mark-ii-noise-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDSLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1D Mark III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1DmkIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24-70 2.8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5D Mark II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5DmkII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Color Chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise Test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After getting enough &#8220;play&#8221; time in with the 5D Mark II, I decided to do a quick noise test.  I wanted to see whether the 5D Mark II would best the 1D Mark III noise control.  After doing some unscientific shots with the 5D Mark II, I was convinced that the 5D Mark II was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After getting enough &#8220;play&#8221; time in with the 5D Mark II, I decided to do a quick noise test.  I wanted to see whether the 5D Mark II would best the 1D Mark III noise control.  After doing some unscientific shots with the 5D Mark II, I was convinced that the 5D Mark II was at least a full stop better than the 1D Mark II in terms of noise control.  So was I right?  Lets see.<span id="more-45"></span></p>
<p>Keep in mind, all shots were done on a tripod and shutter activated via self timer.  The lens used for the test was the Canon 27-70 2.8.  All shots are done at f/5.6 and at 51mm.  I tried ISO 100 &#8211; 6400 since that is the limit of the 1D Mark III will go without using any exposure compensation or pushing it via post processing.  One final note that is that no in camera or post processing noise reduction was done to any of the photos.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="left"></td>
<td width="4%" align="center">Canon 5D Mark II</td>
<td width="40%" align="center">Canon 1D Mark III</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="left">ISO 100</td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3224/3123992696_ea42cb722a_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3224/3123992696_c213b35998_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3112/3123989382_19f58e11b0_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3112/3123989382_7c066a1c8a_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="left">ISO 200</td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3217/3123993508_a803524179_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3224/3123992696_c213b35998_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3122/3123989544_4a0721c49f_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3122/3123989544_67d8793857_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="left">ISO 400</td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3197/3123167899_89d801ff35_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3224/3123992696_c213b35998_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3076/3123163297_756f11a9e8_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3076/3123163297_b5f2626195_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="left">ISO 800</td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3084/3123168767_547126e6fe_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3224/3123992696_c213b35998_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3126/3123989928_691bfff9fd_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3076/3123163297_b5f2626195_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="left">ISO 1600</td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3198/3123169823_08f2be1378_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3224/3123992696_c213b35998_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3126/3123163887_792f1af2f9_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3126/3123163887_41b74deecb_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="left">ISO 3200</td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3256/3123997820_8a53279ce6_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3224/3123992696_c213b35998_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3088/3123990998_032f697e90_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3088/3123990998_5cac5600d2_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="20%" align="left">ISO 6400</td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3248/3123173337_125cd3ff30_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3224/3123992696_c213b35998_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
<td width="40%" align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/3123991976_2ab09803b7_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[45]"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/3123991976_454074e32a_m.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>After performing this first real test, I must say that I take back my initial observation in that the 5D Mark II was at least a stop better than the 1D Mark III.  Certainly this is a color chart test and not exactly real world tests.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" onmouseover="a2a_show_dropdown(this)" onmouseout="a2a_onMouseOut_delay()" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Digital%20DSLR%20Blog&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=Canon%205D%20Mark%20II%20vs%20Canon%201D%20Mark%20II%20Noise%20Test&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2Fcanon-5d-mark-ii-vs-canon-1d-mark-ii-noise-test%2F"><img src="http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-canon-1d-mark-ii-noise-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 5D Mark II High ISO Tests</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/canon-5d-mark-ii-high-iso-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/canon-5d-mark-ii-high-iso-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDSLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5D Mark II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High ISO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After receiving my Canon 5D Mark II yesterday, i&#8217;s time to start taking some test shots.  I figured I&#8217;d go straight for a high ISO test. All shots with the Canon 24-70 @f/4 with +1/3 EC. As you can see the image is split down the middle with one side with 0 NR and 0 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After receiving my Canon 5D Mark II yesterday, i&#8217;s time to start taking some test shots.  I figured I&#8217;d go straight for a high ISO test. All shots with the Canon 24-70 @f/4 with +1/3 EC. As you can see the image is split down the middle with one side with 0 NR and 0 Sharpening. The other side was run through Neat Image and has Sharpening Applied.  Test are done at 3200 and 6400 ISO.  I&#8217;m pretty excited about these results.  I plan to do some low ISO shots tomorrow.<span id="more-31"></span></p>
<p><strong>Test 1</strong></p>
<p>3200 ISO<br />
<img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3261/3094257756_08794d7a04.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3261/3094257756_9caef8e2b2_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[31]">Full Resolution</a></p>
<p>6400 ISO<br />
<img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3265/3094272588_1e4e894b07.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3265/3094272588_bd1317596a_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[31]">Full Resolution</a></p>
<p><strong>Test 2</strong></p>
<p>3200 ISO<br />
<img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3111/3093450569_5915e2a3d5.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3111/3093450569_0c237c7aa7_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[31]">Full Resolution</a></p>
<p>6400 IS<br />
<img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3056/3093463363_0052b1b9bc.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3056/3093463363_f5c1460084_o.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[31]">Full Resolution</a></p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" onmouseover="a2a_show_dropdown(this)" onmouseout="a2a_onMouseOut_delay()" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Digital%20DSLR%20Blog&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=Canon%205D%20Mark%20II%20High%20ISO%20Tests&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2Fcanon-5d-mark-ii-high-iso-tests%2F"><img src="http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/canon-5d-mark-ii-high-iso-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 5D Mark II Announced</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/canon-5d-mark-ii-announced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/canon-5d-mark-ii-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDSLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5D Mark II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High ISO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday Sept. 17, Canon officially announced their successor to the 5D (2005).  The Canon 5D Mark II, official name, is pushing the specs on this one pretty hard.  Some of the highlighted specs are: 21.1MP Full Frame Sensor, New Digic 4 Processor, 1080p Video Capture mode, HDMI output, and 3&#8243; VGA resolution.  View Canon&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday Sept. 17, Canon officially announced their successor to the 5D (2005).  The Canon 5D Mark II, official name, is pushing the specs on this one pretty hard.  Some of the highlighted specs are: 21.1MP Full Frame Sensor, New Digic 4 Processor, 1080p Video Capture mode, HDMI output, and 3&#8243; VGA resolution.  View <a title="Canon 5D Mark II Full Specification" href="http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/eos5dm2/specifications.html" target="_blank">Canon&#8217;s 5D Mark II Full Specifications</a> on their website.  Well after months of speculation, it is official.  The Canon 5D Mark II is scheduled for release in November.</p>
<p>Some helpful links so far:<br />
<a title="Canon 5D Mark II Official Website" href="http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/eos5dm2/" target="_blank">Official Canon 5D Mark II website</a><br />
<a title="Canon 5D Mark II Official Press Release" href="http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20080917_5dmkii.html" target="_blank">Official Canon 5D Mark II Press Release</a><br />
<a title="Canon 5D Mark II Preview" href="http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canoneos5dmarkII/" target="_blank">Canon 5D Mark II Hands on Preview at DP Review</a><br />
<a title="Canon 5D Mark II Sample Image Gallery" href="http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/canoneos5dmkii_preview/" target="_blank">Canon 5D Mark II Sample Gallery at DP Review</a><br />
<a title="Canon 5D Mark II 1080p Sample Movies" href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08091705canon_5dmarkII.asp" target="_blank">Canon 5D Mark II Sample 1080p Movies at DP Review</a></p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" onmouseover="a2a_show_dropdown(this)" onmouseout="a2a_onMouseOut_delay()" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Digital%20DSLR%20Blog&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=Canon%205D%20Mark%20II%20Announced&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2Fcanon-5d-mark-ii-announced%2F"><img src="http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/canon-5d-mark-ii-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
