<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital DSLR Blog &#187; High Definition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/tag/high-definition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog</link>
	<description>DSLR and Digital Photography Reviews Done Right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 22:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NVIDIA GTX 480 Software vs Mercury Playback Engine (MPE) Comparison &#8211; Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/nvidia-gtx-480-software-vs-mercury-playback-engine-mpe-comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/nvidia-gtx-480-software-vs-mercury-playback-engine-mpe-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 22:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDSLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Premiere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CS5 Hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPU Acceleration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury Playback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia GTX 480]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premiere CS5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I received my new NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 today and installed it in my computer.  Using the Adobe Premiere CS5 GPU Hack, I added in my GTX 480 card to the Mercury Playback Engine supported list.  Figured I&#8217;d do a comparison between playback/export times using Software vs Mercury Playback on two separate file formats.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I received my new NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 today and installed it in my computer.  Using the <a title="Adobe Premiere CS5 GPU Hack" href="http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/gpu-accelerationmercury-playback-with-other-nvidia-200-series-cards-in-premiere-cs5/" target="_self">Adobe Premiere CS5 GPU Hack</a>, I added in my GTX 480 card to the Mercury Playback Engine supported list.  Figured I&#8217;d do a comparison between playback/export times using Software vs Mercury Playback on two separate file formats.  I was using my .mov files from the Canon 5D Mark II and the same files converted via HDLink and altered via FirstLight.  Here is how the results turned out.<span id="more-75"></span></p>
<p><strong>Cineform Files &#8211; Software</strong><br />
Total Time- 3min 30sec<br />
No Filter CPU Playback Quality &#8211; Yellow/Smooth<br />
Export Time No Filters &#8211; 4min 17sec<br />
Filter CPU Playback Quality &#8211; Red/Few Stutters<br />
Filter List &#8211; Gaussian Blur(47), Sharpen(43), Fast Color Corrector, Tint(100), Noise(16)<br />
Export Time Filters &#8211; 7min 17sec</p>
<p><strong>Cineform Files &#8211; MPE</strong><br />
Total Time- 3min 30sec<br />
No Filter CPU Playback Quality &#8211; Yellow/Smooth<br />
Export Time No Filters &#8211; 4min 22sec<br />
Filter CPU Playback Quality &#8211; Yellow/Smooth<br />
Filter List &#8211; Gaussian Blur(47), Sharpen(43), Fast Color Corrector, Tint(100), Noise(16)<br />
Export Time Filters &#8211; 4min 49sec</p>
<p><strong>Cineform Files &#8211; CS4</strong><br />
Total Time- 3min 30sec<br />
Filter CPU Playback Quality &#8211; RedStutters<br />
Filter List &#8211; Gaussian Blur(47), Sharpen(43), Fast Color Corrector,  Tint(100), Noise(16)<br />
Export Time Filters &#8211; 15min 32sec</p>
<p><strong>5D Mark II Files &#8211; Software</strong><br />
Total Time- 3min 30sec<br />
No Filter CPU Playback Quality &#8211; Yellow/Smooth<br />
Export Time No Filters &#8211; 3min 42sec<br />
Filter CPU Playback Quality &#8211; Red/Few Stutters<br />
Filter List &#8211; Gaussian Blur(47), Sharpen(43), Fast Color Corrector, Tint(100), Noise(16)<br />
Export Time Filters &#8211; 6min 40sec</p>
<p><strong>5D Mark II Files &#8211; MPE</strong><br />
Total Time- 3min 30sec<br />
No Filter CPU Playback Quality &#8211; Yellow/Smooth<br />
Export Time No Filters &#8211; 3min 40sec<br />
Filter CPU Playback Quality &#8211; Yellow/Smooth<br />
Filter List &#8211; Gaussian Blur(47), Sharpen(43), Fast Color Corrector, Tint(100), Noise(16)<br />
Export Time Filters &#8211; 4min 17sec</p>
<p><strong>Cineform Conclusions</strong></p>
<p>No Filters &#8211; No Difference<br />
Filters 34% less time using MPE (437sec vs 289sec)<br />
69% less time using CS5 MPE vs CS4 (289sec vs 932sec)</p>
<p><strong>5D Mark II Conclusions</strong><br />
No Filters &#8211; No Difference<br />
Filters 36% less time using MPE (400sec vs 257sec)</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" onmouseover="a2a_show_dropdown(this)" onmouseout="a2a_onMouseOut_delay()" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Digital%20DSLR%20Blog&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=NVIDIA%20GTX%20480%20Software%20vs%20Mercury%20Playback%20Engine%20%28MPE%29%20Comparison%20%E2%80%93%20Part%201&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2Fnvidia-gtx-480-software-vs-mercury-playback-engine-mpe-comparison%2F"><img src="http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/nvidia-gtx-480-software-vs-mercury-playback-engine-mpe-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GoPro HD Cameras Released</title>
		<link>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/gopro-hd-cameras-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/gopro-hd-cameras-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DigitalDSLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoPro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoPro HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Definition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GoPro cameras have been a cheap source for capturing video where a traditional video camera was impractical or when shooting solo.  GoPro has since released their latest offering which shoots full 1080p HD video.  In fact the following formats are supported by the new GoPro HD cameras:
 * 1080p = 1920&#215;1080 pixels (16:9), 30 fps, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoPro cameras have been a cheap source for capturing video where a traditional video camera was impractical or when shooting solo.  GoPro has since released their latest offering which shoots full 1080p HD video.  In fact the following formats are supported by the new GoPro HD cameras:</p>
<p><em> * 1080p = 1920&#215;1080 pixels (16:9), 30 fps, 15 Mbit/s data rate<br />
* 960p = 1280&#215;960 pixels (4:3), 30 fps, 12 Mbit/s data rate<br />
* 720p = 1280&#215;720 pixels (16:9), 60 fps, 15 Mbit/s data rate<br />
* 720p = 1280&#215;720 pixels (16:9), 30 fps, 8 Mbit/s data rate<br />
* WVGA = 848&#215;480 pixels (16:9), 60 fps, 8 Mbit/s data rate</em></p>
<p>The GoPro HD cameras are offered in 4 configurations: <a href="http://www.goprocamera.com/index.php?area=2&amp;productid=29">HD Helmet HERO</a>, <a href="http://www.goprocamera.com/index.php?area=2&amp;productid=30">HD Motorsports HERO</a>, <a href="http://www.goprocamera.com/index.php?area=2&amp;productid=31">HD Surf HERO</a>, and <a href="http://www.goprocamera.com/index.php?area=2&amp;productid=33">HD HERO Naked</a>.  Prices range from $260 &#8211; $300.</p>
<p class="addtoany_share_save_container">
    <a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" onmouseover="a2a_show_dropdown(this)" onmouseout="a2a_onMouseOut_delay()" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?sitename=Digital%20DSLR%20Blog&amp;siteurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2F&amp;linkname=GoPro%20HD%20Cameras%20Released&amp;linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.digitaldslr.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2Fgopro-hd-cameras-released%2F"><img src="http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"/></a>

	</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitaldslr.com/blog/index.php/gopro-hd-cameras-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
